Measuring outcomes for biodiversity: Kingston upon Thames

I have written several posts looking at the outcomes for biodiversity, particularly at infill and infrastructure developments in Kingston. These include:


In addition, comments have been sent to councillors, planners etc. regarding general loss of biodiversity at these and sites.  

 Perhaps it's time to draw a number of conclusions so that we do not make the same mistakes at Cambridge road estate and linked sites: Kingsmeadow and Cumberland house

For this investigation,  ecological surveys were obtained for the schemes (usually by FOI requests). The surveys attested to the protection of certain habitats and species in law and policy; and a requirement for the Mitigation Hierachy to be applied; along with Net Gain for biodiversity as per the National Planning Policy Framework.

The final Ecological Recommendations have were then matched against the planning conditions and the sites were visited post-development. On no occasion were the results favourable. Usually, the recommendations were not followed and there was:

a loss of:

  • Habitats such as semi-natural and amenity grassland, scrub, mature and semi-mature trees;
  • Strategic areas such as wildlife corridors; informal fences have been replaced with concrete soil-boards; and rabbit/deer/hedgehog proof fencing at the New Malden Pipe Track;
  • Protected species such as bats, viviparous lizard and possibly this year - slow worms;
  • Lost bird species: kestrels at Tolworth; and priority species such as house sparrow at the gasholder site and Tolworth; 
  • Badger setts: destroyed and disturbed often without a licence (Kingston R**** School,  P**** Manor); and
  • Priority species of fungi.

an increase in:

  • Pollutants such as lighting (especially where non previously existed);
  • Increase in plants on the London invasive species list (5 at Tolworth; The New Malden Pipe Track);

and a retention of:

  • notifiable weeds including Japanese Knotweed;
  • flytipping

Some of the losses have been Mega; in the London Mayors Annual Review 2017, Kingston featured as having the largest loss of a protected area of land of the London Boroughs (2 Ha of Metropolitan open Land at Tolworth Girls) and now LIDL HQ at Jubilee Way must follow a close second.

So why has this happened?

Planning conditions have only paid regard to the Landscape Conditions; landscaping has often ignored the biodiversity reports. These may have been written five years before the Landscape Plan had been submitted for the Discharge of Conditions. 

  • The landscaping has been designed for people: conservation areas are in the wrong place with the wrong species (standard shrubs are being used instead of tree species);
  • No one seems to understand the conditions;
  • No bat or bird boxes are installed;
  • Trees are often allowed to be planted in troughs, which shortens their life to around 5 years;
  • No one seems to care:Seething Wells Sites-of-importance-for-nature conservation. Letter to councillors

What should be done?

Perhaps the following could assist:

  1. Rangers for problem sites particularly Tolworth Court Farm;
  2. An independent scrutiny panel for biodiversity similar to the Design review panel;
  3. An ecologist in the Planning Department advising the planners of the conditions to include for biodiversity.  
  4. Planners should ask for LEMPs before construction as the do with CEMPs (Landscape and Ecological Management Plans);
  5. Scaling back some of the total footprint developments, which are all about greed-lets be honest.
  6. Spend some of the Community Infrastructure Levy money we are raking in: we are told CIL can only be spent on (damaging) infrastructure projects yet this is not the case in other boroughs. 
  7. Repairing wildlife corridors especially on Kingston Hill where Nature Recovery Networks have been identified (Natural England 2020). Wildlife shares a lot of our footpath network yet many of the boroughs  footpaths are being lost or flytipped/trees are felled by developers or have planning applications Lawn Tennis. (The latter may have been refused but only after the trees were felled.
  8. Public Space Protection orders: PSPO orders

Have you a good news story of where a development included some tangible biodiversity benefits?

I only know of only one site in Kingston.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please share your thoughts

Most viewed

Heritage Trees part 2: street trees.

Image
  Oaks and maples Cambridge Gardens 2019   Street trees can often be the most beautiful objects in our streets. They are important to their communities as well as having environmental benefits. They are a living history in our landscape and can have particular connections. They may be fragments of a previous landscape incorporated into a modern street scene, such as the oaks at Cambridge Gardens once  part of the Duke of Cambridge's estate.  A great read with information on how to research street trees is a  History of Street Trees by Dr. M. Johnston.  London plane trees CRE 1976 Beech tree, Chesterton Terrace 1976 Studies show that the difference in local tree cover can reflect the various socio-economic groups. In Victorian times middle class areas were planted with many street trees or had higher quality front gardens than working class districts; now referred to as 'green equity'. It can be demonstrated by looking at old photos of the seven roads that were
Read more

Fishing the Hogsmill

Image
Fly-fishing the Hogsmill   It is interesting to see the river from a different perspective: the Hogsmill is popular with anglers at this time of year; although it is unusual to see someone fly- fishing. A chub has just been caught on bread and it looks a good size. Trout are sometimes seen in the Hogsmill and can sit in the weir notch by the school. Our own Richard Jefferies in his book 'Nature Near London'  remarked on the Hogsmill trout as far up as Tolworth Hall Bridge (now the A240). chub    This fish was carefully unhooked and orientated in the swim where it soon finds it way - probably to the next father and son - sitting further upstream. These anglers have caught the 'ghost' koi within the last two weeks and appear to be the second successful pair to catch the pond-escapee in the last few days. Ghost koi are a British invention. They were produced by accident in the early 80’s when a farmer allowed a mirror carp and a koi to spawn together. The offspring
Read more

Seething Wells: they've done it again

Image
The last day of May, I went to see if I could find the black redstart that had been widely reported, no luck but it will turn up again on one of the old buildings. The lush vegetation was looking beautiful between the Filter Beds at Seething Wells. I made a note of the breeding birds: goldfinches twinkling away, blue tits gathering food, sand martins flying over the FB's (only two this year unfortunately) moorhens and some scruffy little coot chicks entangled in the algal blooms.   Proud parents were showing off their four Canada chicks; they can cover a lot of ground in a short space of time they were soon feeding on water pepper and bistort gleaned from  the ziggerat-sided basins. A song thrush sang from the wharf alongside greenfinches as well as the seasonal chiff chaff; although this year all numbers are down, reflecting not only the topsy-turvy Spring but also the continued tumble in insect numbers (even seed eating birds are dependent on insects to feed their young).
Read more