Tesco's Development at Tolworth

So the Kingston Society are supporting the  planning application for King George's Gate (the Tesco's site at Tolworth) which has now been submitted (15/10074) even though it falls very short of the requirements of the borough's Local Development Framework (LDF), not least due to the low number of affordable units (90 out of 705).Tesco planning app

But the whole ecological assessment is based on a false premise i.e that the nearest statutory designated sites for nature conservation importance are 800 metres away, when in fact they are less than 200 metres. This is not the fault of the consultants acting for Tesco, who have in good faith, obtained information on locally protected sites from the London Biological Records Centre (Greenspace Information for Greater London GiGL).

However when Tolworth Court Farm Fields and The Tolworth Moated Manor sites were notified as LNR's (the latter approved in 2008 Moated Manor Council Decision the council didn't bother to tell anyone). Suffice to say that there was probably confusion between the parties as to whose responsibility this was, as clearly there was  dialogue with Natural England pre-planning, but the two reserves did not appear on the list of 143 Nature Reserves in London London Nature Reserves list which is maintained by Natural England.

So what does this mean? Well clearly the impacts of development on the LNR's have not been assessed evaluated or adequately mitigated. This includes the impacts of the increased numbers of pets, including cats and the increased numbers of dog walkers, on the fragile components of the Statutory Protected Sites .

Pond Tolworth Moated Manor
It also means that the current mitigation is insufficient and inappropriate. Not least, there are few safeguards for the largely unrecognised reptile interest, which radiates from and along the railway corridor. This corridor is one of the most important in the borough for all three of the species of reptile found in Kingston. Grass snake and slow worms are frequently recorded at Knollmead Permaculture site and the adjacent University Sports Ground. The latter have been frequently found  at Tolworth Court Farm and  even recorded being preyed upon by a kestrel! Viviparous lizards are less frequently recorded, but how many reptile surveys are carried out in the borough? This species did  feature in a recent survey carried out for the expansion of Tolworth School.

Yellow meadow ant mounds at TMM, the largest in the borough
Many of us are members of the Kingston Society and would prefer to see better canvassing of its membership in cases of these large controversial developments, which will impact on all our lives. After all it's numerous appeals for 'fresh blood',  it seems the committee have not modified their undemocratic decision making process and seem to accept the Leader of the Council's mantra that we need to accommodate another 30,000 residents, although this may have more to do with the aspiration for an Independent Kingston Surreycomet: Council leader plots Kingstons independence_from_government_funding/.


There are  ways in which a development at this location could have been a solution to some of the problems facing this corner of the borough, including the horrendous levels of air pollution, already in contravention of European Law. Whilst modern developments across London are incorporating water sensitive designs for our radically climate  changed futures, much of the proposed mitigation is highly optional and already out of date.

Comments

  1. Anonymous29 April 2015 at 09:25

    Yep, details of Kingston non-statutory sites of importance for nature conservation (SINCs) and of LNRs isn't terribly clear.

    The Unitary Development Plan (UDP), predecessor to the LDF, listed them by name and designation type (at appendix 6). Overall that list comprised 43 SINCs and 9 LNRs (total 52). Unfortunately the LDF Core Strategy only provides a total number of SINCs and LNRs.

    The Draft Core Strategy stated there are 51 SINC sites in the borough with 9 LNRs "and a further [LNR] at Hogsmill Meadows".
    The December 2011 Inspectors report (appendix b) on the Draft reduced this to 39 sites plus 9 LNRs when it switched to GiGL's figures. The adopted Core Strategy (2012) kept this 39/9 figure as does the LDF 2013 Annual Monitoring Report. So between the UDP and LDF, the number of designated sites reduced first by one, then by a further 3.

    Without a listing of SINCs by grade for the borough and LNRs, I can't easily tell if currently designated sites are the same ones, whether they've the same grade, or if two previously separate sites are now counted as one.

    For example, according to iGiGL, the Metropolitan grade Coombe Hill Golf Course and Borough Importance Grade I Barwell Estate Lake now aren't SINCs at all. Two more listed at Boro. Imp. Grade I in the UDP list, The Grapsome and Meadowlands, are now Grade II. The "Sixty Acre Wood" and "Jubilee Woods (including extension)" Metropolitan SINCs now seem to be counted as one.

    The UDP and Moated Manor Council Decision agree that "Tolworth Court Farm Fields and Medieval Moated Manor" are designated at Boro. Imp. Grade I and "Tolworth Court Farm Fields" is an LNR. GiGL agrees "Tolworth Court Farm Fields and Medieval Moated Manor" is a SINC at that status and specifies in its description that part of the site is an LNR.

    The Inspector's report (appendix a) seems ambiguous on Moated Manor's LNR status. It talked of Farm Fields as an LNR, and "progressing the designation of Tolworth Court Farm Manor site [... that was] identified locally being a potential location for protected species/habitats and as such the Council produced a management plan to effect its designation as a Local Nature Reserve". The RBK Annual Monitoring Report 2013 (at pg 44) says there are nine LNRs and 39 SINCs. I'd expect the number of LNRs to have risen to ten had the designation of Moated Manor been completed.

    Nature England's LNR list has 12 where Kingston was the Declaring Authority, versus the UDP list having named 9. Within the 12 not all have declaration dates, though the latest is Jubilee Wood at 1995. NE lists all 8 UDP ones (not the 9th Tolworth Court Farm Fields), plus separately lists Rose Walk, Elmbridge Open Space, Southwood Open Space, Ham Lands. Ham Lands only appears on NE's list.
    Among the UDP list is "The Hogsmill River Park (comprising Rose Walk, Elmbridge Avenue, Hogsmill Wood, Hogsmill Open Space & South Wood Drive Open Space)", whereas NE lists Rose Walk, Elmbridge Open Space and Southwood Open Space separately. Confusingly, NE's Elmbridge Open Space description repeats the contents of those brackets and adds Jubilee Woods for good measure. Their Hogsmill River Park entry's description merely refers to the Hogsmill River.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Benton30 April 2015 at 05:34

    Thanks for your comments Richard. I would add that some of the above are 'splits' to make it look like there are more SNCI's than there actually are. In fact the land areas have shrunk and one is Planning 'gain'. I refer to the Meadowland's which appeared after development of MOD land in Chessington and refers to a small parcel of land, which has not been managed for the orchids for which it was designated (as well as a portion of an unrelated area). Other than one Pyramidal found last year the only Orchid is the name of the road-Orchid Close.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please share your thoughts

Most viewed

Heritage Trees part 2: street trees.

Image
  Oaks and maples Cambridge Gardens 2019   Street trees can often be the most beautiful objects in our streets. They are important to their communities as well as having environmental benefits. They are a living history in our landscape and can have particular connections. They may be fragments of a previous landscape incorporated into a modern street scene, such as the oaks at Cambridge Gardens once  part of the Duke of Cambridge's estate.  A great read with information on how to research street trees is a  History of Street Trees by Dr. M. Johnston.  London plane trees CRE 1976 Beech tree, Chesterton Terrace 1976 Studies show that the difference in local tree cover can reflect the various socio-economic groups. In Victorian times middle class areas were planted with many street trees or had higher quality front gardens than working class districts; now referred to as 'green equity'. It can be demonstrated by looking at old photos of the seven roads that were
Read more

Fishing the Hogsmill

Image
Fly-fishing the Hogsmill   It is interesting to see the river from a different perspective: the Hogsmill is popular with anglers at this time of year; although it is unusual to see someone fly- fishing. A chub has just been caught on bread and it looks a good size. Trout are sometimes seen in the Hogsmill and can sit in the weir notch by the school. Our own Richard Jefferies in his book 'Nature Near London'  remarked on the Hogsmill trout as far up as Tolworth Hall Bridge (now the A240). chub    This fish was carefully unhooked and orientated in the swim where it soon finds it way - probably to the next father and son - sitting further upstream. These anglers have caught the 'ghost' koi within the last two weeks and appear to be the second successful pair to catch the pond-escapee in the last few days. Ghost koi are a British invention. They were produced by accident in the early 80’s when a farmer allowed a mirror carp and a koi to spawn together. The offspring
Read more

Seething Wells: they've done it again

Image
The last day of May, I went to see if I could find the black redstart that had been widely reported, no luck but it will turn up again on one of the old buildings. The lush vegetation was looking beautiful between the Filter Beds at Seething Wells. I made a note of the breeding birds: goldfinches twinkling away, blue tits gathering food, sand martins flying over the FB's (only two this year unfortunately) moorhens and some scruffy little coot chicks entangled in the algal blooms.   Proud parents were showing off their four Canada chicks; they can cover a lot of ground in a short space of time they were soon feeding on water pepper and bistort gleaned from  the ziggerat-sided basins. A song thrush sang from the wharf alongside greenfinches as well as the seasonal chiff chaff; although this year all numbers are down, reflecting not only the topsy-turvy Spring but also the continued tumble in insect numbers (even seed eating birds are dependent on insects to feed their young).
Read more